CRH
Price
$128.94
Change
+$1.40 (+1.10%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
85.33B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HCMLY
Price
$19.69
Change
+$0.05 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
54.26B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs HCMLY

Header iconCRH vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts CRH vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
CRH Public
Price$128.94
Change+$1.40 (+1.10%)
Volume$3.26M
Capitalization85.33B
HOLCIM
Price$19.69
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
Volume$48.14K
Capitalization54.26B
CRH vs HCMLY Comparison Chart in %
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCMLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. HCMLY commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and HCMLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CRH: $128.94 vs. HCMLY: $19.69)
Brand notoriety: CRH and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 39% vs. HCMLY: 49%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $86.27B vs. HCMLY: $54.26B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $86.27B. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $54.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $86.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $11.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than HCMLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the short-term than HCMLY.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +14.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+14.90% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($85.3B) has a higher market cap than HCMLY($54.3B). CRH has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: CRH (25.46) vs HCMLY (13.65). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 75.661 vs. CRH (39.399). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.38B vs. HCMLY (6.95B). HCMLY (4.24B) and CRH (4.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CRH has higher revenues than HCMLY: CRH (36.9B) vs HCMLY (26.2B).
CRHHCMLYCRH / HCMLY
Capitalization85.3B54.3B157%
EBITDA7.38B6.95B106%
Gain YTD39.39975.66152%
P/E Ratio25.4613.65186%
Revenue36.9B26.2B141%
Total Cash4.2B4.24B99%
Total Debt20.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
313
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
102
SMR RATING
1..100
5442
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCMLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (19) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (10) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (41) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (73) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHHCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HCMLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KOLD34.501.63
+4.96%
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Natrl Gas
QLD72.730.37
+0.51%
ProShares Ultra QQQ
COWS33.670.13
+0.40%
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
IXG122.440.47
+0.39%
iShares Global Financials ETF
RSMR22.070.04
+0.17%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been loosely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
+0.74%
VMC - CRH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
MLM - CRH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
KNF - CRH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
EXP - CRH
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
BCC - CRH
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+0.25%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
MLM - HCMLY
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More