Advertisement
CRH vs HCMLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Hold and HCMLF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HCMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HCMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while HCMLF (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-0.15% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | HCMLF | CRH / HCMLF | |
| Capitalization | 82.2B | 53.7B | 153% |
| EBITDA | 7.38B | 6.95B | 106% |
| Gain YTD | -2.236 | 9.680 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.54 | 13.78 | 178% |
| Revenue | 36.9B | 26.2B | 141% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 4.24B | 99% |
| Total Debt | 20.7B | N/A | - |
CRH | HCMLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCMLF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (19) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLF (35) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.
HCMLF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (54) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
HCMLF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CRH (49) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLF’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLF (66) in the null industry. This means that CRH’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRH | HCMLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 48% | 22 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VPL | 99.91 | 1.25 | +1.27% |
| Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF | |||
| OSCV | 39.72 | 0.42 | +1.07% |
| Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF | |||
| FMTM | 36.03 | 0.23 | +0.65% |
| MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF | |||
| BBBS | 51.42 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| BondBloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Yr Corp Bd ETF | |||
| BCDF | 30.39 | -0.85 | -2.72% |
| Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Dev ETF | |||
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
HCMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HCMLF and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCMLF and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCMLF | 100% | +5.86% | ||
| HCMLY - HCMLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| JHX - HCMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| HDLMY - HCMLF | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| CRH - HCMLF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| CX - HCMLF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||