It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while CX (@Construction Materials) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +14.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.07%.
CRH is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
CX is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.
Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | CX | CRH / CX | |
| Capitalization | 86.3B | 17.4B | 496% |
| EBITDA | 7.38B | 1.91B | 387% |
| Gain YTD | 40.929 | 114.334 | 36% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.74 | 13.22 | 195% |
| Revenue | 36.9B | 15.9B | 232% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 1.2B | 350% |
| Total Debt | 20.7B | 7.36B | 281% |
CRH | CX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRH's Valuation (20) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (22). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (36). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's SMR Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (68). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.
CX's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (41). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.
CRH's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for CX (95). This means that CRH’s stock grew significantly faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.
| CRH | CX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 49% | 11 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DBEU | 48.15 | 0.16 | +0.34% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF | |||
| PCIG | 9.19 | 0.02 | +0.22% |
| Polen Capital International Growth ETF | |||
| SCHO | 24.35 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Schwab Short-Term US Treasury ETF™ | |||
| TEKY | 37.87 | N/A | N/A |
| Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF | |||
| BSMV | 21.11 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2031 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been loosely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CX has been loosely correlated with CRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CX jumps, then CRH could also see price increases.