CRGY
Price
$8.99
Change
-$0.24 (-2.60%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
90 days until earnings call
VTS
Price
$24.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
959.55M
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRGY vs VTS

Header iconCRGY vs VTS Comparison
Open Charts CRGY vs VTSBanner chart's image
Crescent Energy
Price$8.99
Change-$0.24 (-2.60%)
Volume$3M
Capitalization2.29B
Vitesse Energy
Price$24.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$225.79K
Capitalization959.55M
CRGY vs VTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRGY vs. VTS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGY is a Buy and VTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CRGY: $8.99 vs. VTS: $24.85)
Brand notoriety: CRGY and VTS are both not notable
CRGY represents the Integrated Oil, while VTS is part of the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRGY: 91% vs. VTS: 64%
Market capitalization -- CRGY: $2.29B vs. VTS: $959.55M
CRGY [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $2.29B. VTS’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $959.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $451.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $55.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VTS is a better buy in the long-term than CRGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VTS is a better buy in the short-term than CRGY.

Price Growth

CRGY (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.24% price change this week, while VTS (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +5.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.45%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

VTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.36% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.34% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRGY($2.29B) has a higher market cap than VTS($960M). CRGY has higher P/E ratio than VTS: CRGY (62.45) vs VTS (22.80). VTS YTD gains are higher at: 4.193 vs. CRGY (-36.927). CRGY has more cash in the bank: 6.26M vs. VTS (4.5M). VTS has less debt than CRGY: VTS (122M) vs CRGY (3.68B).
CRGYVTSCRGY / VTS
Capitalization2.29B960M238%
EBITDA1.18BN/A-
Gain YTD-36.9274.193-881%
P/E Ratio62.4522.80274%
Revenue3.22BN/A-
Total Cash6.26M4.5M139%
Total Debt3.68B122M3,018%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRGYVTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PVFYX24.89N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Core Equity Y
CGTRX9.13-0.01
-0.11%
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst2
MFQAX17.77-0.04
-0.22%
AMG Veritas Global Focus N
NPNEX48.79-0.13
-0.27%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value E
NWADX21.39-0.10
-0.47%
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle

CRGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRGY has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRGY jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRGY
1D Price
Change %
CRGY100%
-2.60%
MTDR - CRGY
86%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
PR - CRGY
86%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
NOG - CRGY
86%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
CHRD - CRGY
85%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
SM - CRGY
85%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
More

VTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTS has been closely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTS jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VTS
1D Price
Change %
VTS100%
N/A
CRGY - VTS
76%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
CHRD - VTS
75%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
NOG - VTS
75%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
PR - VTS
74%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
OVV - VTS
74%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
More