CREX
Price
$2.65
Change
-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
27.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FALC
Price
$1.40
Change
+$0.04 (+2.94%)
Updated
Dec 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.01M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CREX vs FALC

Header iconCREX vs FALC Comparison
Open Charts CREX vs FALCBanner chart's image
Creative Realities
Price$2.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.38%)
Volume$3.43K
Capitalization27.93M
FalconStor Software
Price$1.40
Change+$0.04 (+2.94%)
Volume$452
Capitalization10.01M
CREX vs FALC Comparison Chart in %
CREX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FALC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CREX vs. FALC commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CREX is a StrongBuy and FALC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CREX: $2.65 vs. FALC: $1.40)
Brand notoriety: CREX and FALC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CREX: 6% vs. FALC: 15%
Market capitalization -- CREX: $27.93M vs. FALC: $10.01M
CREX [@Packaged Software] is valued at $27.93M. FALC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $10.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CREX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFALC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CREX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FALC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CREX is a better buy in the long-term than FALC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CREX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FALC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CREX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FALC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CREX is a better buy in the short-term than FALC.

Price Growth

CREX (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.67% price change this week, while FALC (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.39% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CREX($27.9M) has a higher market cap than FALC($10M). CREX YTD gains are higher at: 8.367 vs. FALC (-30.000). FALC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.84M vs. CREX (-2.81M). FALC has more cash in the bank: 1.92M vs. CREX (314K). FALC has less debt than CREX: FALC (2.3M) vs CREX (24M). CREX has higher revenues than FALC: CREX (44.3M) vs FALC (11.2M).
CREXFALCCREX / FALC
Capitalization27.9M10M279%
EBITDA-2.81M1.84M-153%
Gain YTD8.367-30.000-28%
P/E Ratio12.53N/A-
Revenue44.3M11.2M396%
Total Cash314K1.92M16%
Total Debt24M2.3M1,043%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CREX vs FALC: Fundamental Ratings
CREX
FALC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6179
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9057
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4217

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CREX's Valuation (52) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (77) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's SMR Rating (97) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (100) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

CREX's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FALC (79) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CREX’s stock grew similarly to FALC’s over the last 12 months.

FALC's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CREX (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FALC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CREX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CREXFALC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CREX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FALC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWW1030.736.83
+0.67%
WW Grainger
DOYU7.020.02
+0.29%
DouYu International Holdings Limited
EHLD6.820.01
+0.15%
Euroholdings Ltd
TDS40.20-0.39
-0.96%
Telephone and Data Systems
MVST3.01-0.09
-2.90%
Microvast Holdings

CREX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CREX and FRSH have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CREX and FRSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CREX
1D Price
Change %
CREX100%
-0.19%
FRSH - CREX
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
CDNS - CREX
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
DBD - CREX
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
DAVE - CREX
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.47%
SNOW - CREX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More

FALC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FALC has been loosely correlated with WRDLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FALC jumps, then WRDLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FALC
1D Price
Change %
FALC100%
N/A
WRDLY - FALC
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
WWLNF - FALC
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CXM - FALC
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
CREX - FALC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AI - FALC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More