Advertisement
CRESY vs MATW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a StrongBuy and MATW is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRESY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MATW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRESY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MATW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
| CRESY | MATW | CRESY / MATW | |
| Capitalization | 638M | 954M | 67% |
| EBITDA | 195B | 175M | 111,429% |
| Gain YTD | -15.914 | -19.323 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.97 | 27.91 | 32% |
| Revenue | 185B | 1.88B | 9,830% |
| Total Cash | 223B | 37.9M | 588,391% |
| Total Debt | 812B | 931M | 87,218% |
CRESY | MATW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRESY's Valuation (8) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MATW (23) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to MATW’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATW (82) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's SMR Rating (46) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MATW (93) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MATW’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MATW (60) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to MATW’s over the last 12 months.
CRESY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MATW (39) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to MATW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRESY | MATW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 77% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EDIRX | 11.08 | -0.10 | -0.89% |
| Eaton Vance Global Income Builder R | |||
| VQNPX | 63.87 | -0.79 | -1.22% |
| Vanguard Growth & Income Inv | |||
| CMVYX | 13.64 | -0.20 | -1.45% |
| Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl 3 | |||
| DISSX | 22.33 | -0.44 | -1.93% |
| BNY Mellon Small Cap Stock Index Inv | |||
| LPFCX | 5.42 | -0.14 | -2.52% |
| ALPS Global Opportunity C | |||
CRESY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRESY and HON have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRESY and HON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRESY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESY | 100% | -4.07% | ||
| HON - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| FIP - CRESY | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| IIIN - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| CODI - CRESY | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.51% | ||
| MATW - CRESY | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.28% | ||
More | ||||
MATW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MATW has been loosely correlated with NWPX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MATW jumps, then NWPX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MATW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATW | 100% | -3.28% | ||
| NWPX - MATW | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CODI - MATW | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
| IIIN - MATW | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| HON - MATW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MDU - MATW | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||