CRESY
Price
$11.50
Change
-$0.35 (-2.95%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
781.96M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IEP
Price
$8.78
Change
-$0.22 (-2.44%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.27B
110 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRESY vs IEP

Header iconCRESY vs IEP Comparison
Open Charts CRESY vs IEPBanner chart's image
Cresud S.A.C.I.F. y A
Price$11.50
Change-$0.35 (-2.95%)
Volume$187.39K
Capitalization781.96M
Icahn Enterprises
Price$8.78
Change-$0.22 (-2.44%)
Volume$1.8M
Capitalization5.27B
CRESY vs IEP Comparison Chart in %
CRESY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRESY vs. IEP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRESY is a StrongBuy and IEP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CRESY: $11.50 vs. IEP: $8.78)
Brand notoriety: CRESY and IEP are both not notable
CRESY represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while IEP is part of the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRESY: 60% vs. IEP: 227%
Market capitalization -- CRESY: $781.96M vs. IEP: $5.27B
CRESY [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $781.96M. IEP’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $5.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $156.64B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $58.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $15.03B. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRESY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIEP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRESY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRESY is a better buy in the long-term than IEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRESY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRESY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IEP is a better buy in the short-term than CRESY.

Price Growth

CRESY (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while IEP (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

IEP is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.85% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.12% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEP($5.27B) has a higher market cap than CRESY($782M). IEP YTD gains are higher at: 21.647 vs. CRESY (-6.176). CRESY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 361B vs. IEP (55M). CRESY has more cash in the bank: 513B vs. IEP (3.78B). IEP has less debt than CRESY: IEP (6.71B) vs CRESY (1.43T). CRESY has higher revenues than IEP: CRESY (696B) vs IEP (9.41B).
CRESYIEPCRESY / IEP
Capitalization782M5.27B15%
EBITDA361B55M656,364%
Gain YTD-6.17621.647-29%
P/E Ratio11.16N/A-
Revenue696B9.41B7,400%
Total Cash513B3.78B13,586%
Total Debt1.43T6.71B21,287%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRESY vs IEP: Fundamental Ratings
CRESY
IEP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
248
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
27100
SMR RATING
1..100
7096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRESY's Valuation (7) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEP (46) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew significantly faster than IEP’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's SMR Rating (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IEP (96) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IEP (51) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.

CRESY's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as IEP (48) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that CRESY’s stock grew similarly to IEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRESYIEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRESY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IEP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCSAX17.140.09
+0.53%
Allspring Common Stock A
DNLVX22.330.07
+0.31%
Dunham Large Cap Value N
QQMNX21.920.02
+0.09%
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral IS
MITCX35.68N/A
N/A
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr C
RYEAX237.64-2.96
-1.23%
Rydex Energy H

CRESY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRESY has been loosely correlated with IRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRESY jumps, then IRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRESY
1D Price
Change %
CRESY100%
-0.17%
IRS - CRESY
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
IEP - CRESY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
IIIN - CRESY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
MMM - CRESY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
BOC - CRESY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
More

IEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEP has been loosely correlated with CVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEP jumps, then CVI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEP
1D Price
Change %
IEP100%
-0.66%
CVI - IEP
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
PSX - IEP
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
CODI - IEP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
DINO - IEP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
MPC - IEP
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More