Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRDRX vs PATRX
CRDRX vs PATRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRDRX vs. PATRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDRX is a Hold and PATRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATRX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. CRDRX (2.46B). PATRX pays higher dividends than CRDRX: PATRX (5.62) vs CRDRX (2.35). CRDRX was incepted earlier than PATRX: CRDRX (13 years) vs PATRX (20 years). PATRX (2.65) is less costly to investors than CRDRX (0.82). CRDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. PATRX (40.00). CRDRX (0) and PATRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CRDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. PATRX (7.46). PATRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. CRDRX (9.21).
| CRDRX | PATRX | CRDRX / PATRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.56 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 2.65 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.464 | 8.078 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 10.9B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 5.62 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 7.46 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.76 | 14.62 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.21 | 33.79 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.35 | 65.33 | 46% |