Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRDRX vs PASCX
CRDRX vs PASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRDRX vs. PASCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDRX is a Hold and PASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. CRDRX (2.46B). PASCX pays higher dividends than CRDRX: PASCX (5.07) vs CRDRX (2.35). CRDRX was incepted earlier than PASCX: CRDRX (13 years) vs PASCX (22 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than CRDRX (0.82). CRDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. PASCX (40.00). CRDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than PASCX: CRDRX (0) vs PASCX (1000). CRDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. PASCX (6.96). PASCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.44 vs. CRDRX (9.21).
| CRDRX | PASCX | CRDRX / PASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.06 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 3.15 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.464 | 7.796 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.46B | 10.9B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 5.07 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.14 | 6.96 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.76 | 12.87 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.21 | 30.44 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.35 | 57.32 | 53% |