CRDOF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.01 (-1.92%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
58.98M
LOMLF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
129.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRDOF vs LOMLF

Header iconCRDOF vs LOMLF Comparison
Open Charts CRDOF vs LOMLFBanner chart's image
Cerrado Gold
Price$0.52
Change-$0.01 (-1.92%)
Volume$96.11K
Capitalization58.98M
Lion One Metals
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$105.39K
Capitalization129.14M
CRDOF vs LOMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRDOF vs. LOMLF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDOF is a Hold and LOMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CRDOF: $0.46 vs. LOMLF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: CRDOF and LOMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRDOF: 44% vs. LOMLF: 136%
Market capitalization -- CRDOF: $58.98M vs. LOMLF: $129.14M
CRDOF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $58.98M. LOMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $129.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRDOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRDOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRDOF is a better buy in the long-term than LOMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRDOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRDOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMLF is a better buy in the short-term than CRDOF.

Price Growth

CRDOF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while LOMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOMLF($129M) has a higher market cap than CRDOF($59M). CRDOF YTD gains are higher at: 73.913 vs. LOMLF (19.438). CRDOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.98M vs. LOMLF (-3.37M). LOMLF has more cash in the bank: 36.9M vs. CRDOF (18.6M). LOMLF has less debt than CRDOF: LOMLF (25.9M) vs CRDOF (49.2M). CRDOF has higher revenues than LOMLF: CRDOF (90.5M) vs LOMLF (0).
CRDOFLOMLFCRDOF / LOMLF
Capitalization59M129M46%
EBITDA1.98M-3.37M-59%
Gain YTD73.91319.438380%
P/E Ratio16.00N/A-
Revenue90.5M0-
Total Cash18.6M36.9M50%
Total Debt49.2M25.9M190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LOMLF: Fundamental Ratings
LOMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRDOFLOMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
82%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRDOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

CRDOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDOF and VAUCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDOF and VAUCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRDOF
1D Price
Change %
CRDOF100%
-2.34%
VAUCF - CRDOF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
VGMIF - CRDOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - CRDOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
OCGSF - CRDOF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.11%
SNWGF - CRDOF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with KNTNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then KNTNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
+1.30%
KNTNF - LOMLF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
LUGDF - LOMLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
NESRF - LOMLF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
TORXF - LOMLF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
STLRF - LOMLF
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.28%
More