CRDL vs TLRY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDL is a Hold and TLRY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRDL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLRY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRDL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TLRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRDL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLRY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRDL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TLRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRDL (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +12.72% price change this week, while TLRY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -10.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.07%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRDL is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
TLRY is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+3.78% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CRDL | TLRY | CRDL / TLRY | |
| Capitalization | 124M | 1.87B | 7% |
| EBITDA | -30.61M | -1.23B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -21.094 | -66.165 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 8.52 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 700M | - |
| Total Cash | 40.5M | 260M | 16% |
| Total Debt | 181K | 529M | 0% |
CRDL | TLRY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TLRY's Valuation (49) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRDL (96) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CRDL (100) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's SMR Rating (96) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CRDL (99) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
CRDL's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as TLRY (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that CRDL’s stock grew similarly to TLRY’s over the last 12 months.
TLRY's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as CRDL (100) in the null industry. This means that TLRY’s stock grew similarly to CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
| CRDL | TLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 27 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
CRDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDL and CGC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDL and CGC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDL | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGC - CRDL | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ACB - CRDL | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.30% | ||
| OGI - CRDL | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
| TLRY - CRDL | 30% Poorly correlated | -5.42% | ||
| CRON - CRDL | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TLRY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLRY has been closely correlated with CGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TLRY jumps, then CGC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLRY | 100% | -5.42% | ||
| CGC - TLRY | 72% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| ACB - TLRY | 68% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| CRON - TLRY | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| OGI - TLRY | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| FLGC - TLRY | 30% Poorly correlated | +11.26% | ||
More | ||||