CRBG
Price
$33.14
Change
+$0.53 (+1.63%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
17.85B
44 days until earnings call
SHNWF
Price
$5.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.7B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRBG vs SHNWF

Header iconCRBG vs SHNWF Comparison
Open Charts CRBG vs SHNWFBanner chart's image
Corebridge Financial
Price$33.14
Change+$0.53 (+1.63%)
Volume$2.07M
Capitalization17.85B
Schroders
Price$5.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$357
Capitalization7.7B
CRBG vs SHNWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBG vs. SHNWF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBG is a Buy and SHNWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CRBG: $33.14 vs. SHNWF: $5.32)
Brand notoriety: CRBG and SHNWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBG: 54% vs. SHNWF: 9%
Market capitalization -- CRBG: $17.85B vs. SHNWF: $7.7B
CRBG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.85B. SHNWF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHNWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHNWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHNWF is a better buy in the long-term than CRBG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRBG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHNWF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRBG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHNWF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRBG is a better buy in the short-term than SHNWF.

Price Growth

CRBG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while SHNWF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRBG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBG($17.8B) has a higher market cap than SHNWF($7.7B). CRBG has higher P/E ratio than SHNWF: CRBG (31.06) vs SHNWF (17.75). SHNWF YTD gains are higher at: 26.786 vs. CRBG (13.245). SHNWF has less debt than CRBG: SHNWF (588M) vs CRBG (11.3B).
CRBGSHNWFCRBG / SHNWF
Capitalization17.8B7.7B231%
EBITDAN/A655M-
Gain YTD13.24526.78649%
P/E Ratio31.0617.75175%
RevenueN/A3.02B-
Total CashN/A7.06B-
Total Debt11.3B588M1,922%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBGSHNWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHNWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGM125.430.37
+0.30%
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
VSHY21.970.06
+0.25%
Virtus Newfleet Short Dur Hi Yld Bd ETF
GGME64.440.14
+0.22%
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
QJUN30.970.06
+0.19%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - Jun
ENDTF11.02-0.08
-0.72%
Canoe EIT Income Fund

CRBG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRBG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBG
1D Price
Change %
CRBG100%
+1.63%
EQH - CRBG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
AMP - CRBG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
JHG - CRBG
77%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
STT - CRBG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
KKR - CRBG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
More

SHNWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHNWF and FNCSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHNWF and FNCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHNWF
1D Price
Change %
SHNWF100%
N/A
FNCSF - SHNWF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GAMI - SHNWF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
PWM - SHNWF
10%
Poorly correlated
+9.38%
CRBG - SHNWF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
DEFG - SHNWF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
More