CRBG
Price
$33.79
Change
-$0.45 (-1.31%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
18.2B
86 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$7.27
Change
+$0.04 (+0.55%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
433.95M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRBG vs FNNCF

Header iconCRBG vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts CRBG vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Corebridge Financial
Price$33.79
Change-$0.45 (-1.31%)
Volume$2.9M
Capitalization18.2B
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.27
Change+$0.04 (+0.55%)
Volume$501
Capitalization433.95M
CRBG vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRBG vs. FNNCF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRBG is a Hold and FNNCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CRBG: $33.79 vs. FNNCF: $7.27)
Brand notoriety: CRBG and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRBG: 76% vs. FNNCF: 34%
Market capitalization -- CRBG: $18.2B vs. FNNCF: $433.95M
CRBG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $18.2B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $433.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRBG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRBG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRBG is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRBG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRBG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CRBG and FNNCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CRBG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.47% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRBG is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.77% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRBG($18.2B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($434M). CRBG has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: CRBG (31.06) vs FNNCF (1.71). CRBG YTD gains are higher at: 14.614 vs. FNNCF (13.240).
CRBGFNNCFCRBG / FNNCF
Capitalization18.2B434M4,194%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.61413.240110%
P/E Ratio31.061.711,817%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt12.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRBGFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSJS22.100.01
+0.04%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 HY Corp Bd ETF
CGMS27.67N/A
N/A
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
SBI7.67-0.01
-0.07%
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund
QHDG28.23-0.10
-0.34%
Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF
CEFD19.45-0.08
-0.39%
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5X Lvgd CE Fd ETN

CRBG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRBG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBG
1D Price
Change %
CRBG100%
-1.31%
EQH - CRBG
86%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
AMP - CRBG
78%
Closely correlated
-2.07%
JHG - CRBG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
KKR - CRBG
76%
Closely correlated
-2.59%
CG - CRBG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
More

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+0.55%
BUR - FNNCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBG - FNNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
WT - FNNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
AIMFF - FNNCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
More