Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. FLMFX (1.17B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.79) vs FLMFX (0.75). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMFX (38 years). FLMFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. FLMFX (12.26). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.00 vs. CRAZX (10.50).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.833 | 4.200 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 1.17B | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 0.75 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 12.26 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 25.90 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.50 | 28.00 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.02 | 87.66 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement