Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMFX
CRAZX vs FLMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. FLMFX (1.12B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMFX: CRAZX (2.20) vs FLMFX (0.75). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMFX (37 years). FLMFX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. FLMFX (8.88). FLMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.87 vs. CRAZX (7.31).
| CRAZX | FLMFX | CRAZX / FLMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.752 | 11.511 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 1.12B | 223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 0.75 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | 8.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 27.22 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | 30.87 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.16 | 67.91 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement