Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.5B vs. FLMAX (1.07B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.26) vs FLMAX (1.06). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (13 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). FLMAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. FLMAX (-3.32). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.15 vs. CRAZX (13.34).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.851 | 13.281 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.5B | 1.07B | 233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 1.06 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | -3.32 | -335% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.82 | 31.11 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.34 | 46.15 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers