Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLMAX
CRAZX vs FLMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLMAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. FLMAX (1.12B). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLMAX: CRAZX (2.20) vs FLMAX (1.04). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLMAX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLMAX (9 years). FLMAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 312.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLMAX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLMAX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. FLMAX (9.13). FLMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. CRAZX (7.31).
| CRAZX | FLMAX | CRAZX / FLMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.752 | 11.765 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 1.12B | 223% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.04 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | 9.13 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 28.58 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | 33.28 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement