Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. FLDFX (442M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.20) vs FLDFX (1.05). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. FLDFX (8.66). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.39 vs. CRAZX (7.31).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.752 | 10.543 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 442M | 567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 1.05 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | 8.66 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.24 | 23.60 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.31 | 15.39 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.16 | 47.31 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement