Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.55B vs. FLDFX (447M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.87) vs FLDFX (0.92). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. FLDFX (11.93). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.46 vs. CRAZX (11.34).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.550 | 1.845 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 447M | 570% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 0.92 | 313% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 11.93 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.49 | 22.39 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.34 | 14.46 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.55 | 56.22 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement