Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRAZX vs FLDFX
CRAZX vs FLDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CRAZX vs. FLDFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRAZX is a Hold and FLDFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRAZX has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. FLDFX (452M). CRAZX pays higher dividends than FLDFX: CRAZX (2.79) vs FLDFX (0.90). CRAZX was incepted earlier than FLDFX: CRAZX (14 years) vs FLDFX (20 years). FLDFX (1.50) is less costly to investors than CRAZX (0.81). FLDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 247.00 vs. CRAZX (186.00). CRAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDFX: CRAZX (2000) vs FLDFX (2500). CRAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.29 vs. FLDFX (10.91). FLDFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.86 vs. CRAZX (10.50).
| CRAZX | FLDFX | CRAZX / FLDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.50 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.833 | 3.026 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 452M | 558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 0.90 | 311% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.29 | 10.91 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.78 | 22.35 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.50 | 13.86 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.02 | 59.15 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement