CQRLF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
CYNXF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

CQRLF vs CYNXF

Header iconCQRLF vs CYNXF Comparison
Open Charts CQRLF vs CYNXFBanner chart's image
Conquest Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
INTERNATIONAL METALS MNG
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
CQRLF vs CYNXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQRLF vs. CYNXF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQRLF is a Hold and CYNXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CQRLF: $0.02 vs. CYNXF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: CQRLF and CYNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQRLF: 40% vs. CYNXF: 59%
Market capitalization -- CQRLF: $2.04M vs. CYNXF: $716.51K
CQRLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.04M. CYNXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $716.51K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQRLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCYNXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CQRLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CYNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CYNXF is a better buy in the long-term than CQRLF.

Price Growth

CQRLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.11% price change this week, while CYNXF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQRLF($2.04M) has a higher market cap than CYNXF($717K). CQRLF YTD gains are higher at: 27.737 vs. CYNXF (-77.314). CQRLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -764.16K vs. CYNXF (-4.19M). CQRLF has more cash in the bank: 1.28M vs. CYNXF (15.1K). CQRLF (0) and CYNXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CQRLFCYNXFCQRLF / CYNXF
Capitalization2.04M717K285%
EBITDA-764.16K-4.19M18%
Gain YTD27.737-77.314-36%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.28M15.1K8,450%
Total DebtN/A46K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQRLF: Fundamental Ratings
CQRLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
99
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CQRLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CQRLF and CYNXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CQRLF and CYNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQRLF
1D Price
Change %
CQRLF100%
N/A
CYNXF - CQRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGZ - CQRLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.18%
GRLGF - CQRLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RVSDF - CQRLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
CNDGF - CQRLF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CYNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYNXF and NPTLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYNXF and NPTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYNXF
1D Price
Change %
CYNXF100%
N/A
NPTLF - CYNXF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CQRLF - CYNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLSR - CYNXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
CDNMF - CYNXF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDLNF - CYNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.61%
More