Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs TDF
CQQQ vs TDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. TDF commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and TDF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.99B vs. TDF (340M). TDF has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: TDF (41.450) vs CQQQ (37.836). CQQQ was incepted earlier than TDF: CQQQ (16 years) vs TDF (31 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than TDF (1.33). CQQQ has a higher turnover TDF (38.79) vs TDF (38.79).
| CQQQ | TDF | CQQQ / TDF | |
| Gain YTD | 37.836 | 41.450 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 340M | 881% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.33 | 49% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 38.79 | 111% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 1.10 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 31 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | TDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 24 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.18% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -4.78% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -6.43% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.52% | ||
More | ||||
TDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDF has been loosely correlated with PDD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TDF jumps, then PDD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDF | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| PDD - TDF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| YUMC - TDF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.50% |