Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.34
Change-$0.99 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.7M
Net Assets2.89B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$31.40
Change-$0.05 (-0.16%)
Volume$17.71K
Net Assets154.68M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.89B vs. PGJ (155M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (37.989) vs PGJ (23.026). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.70). CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 37.989 | 23.026 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 155M | 1,864% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 25.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 2.51 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 17 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQH | 54.63 | 0.28 | +0.51% |
| NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF | |||
| XJAN | 36.04 | 0.11 | +0.30% |
| FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Jan | |||
| MAKX | 53.44 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | |||
| FPF | 18.79 | -0.03 | -0.16% |
| FIRST TRUST INTERMEDIATE DURATION PREFERRED & Income FUND | |||
| FUND | 8.37 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| Sprott Focus Trust | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 77% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 76% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||