Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$51.68
Change+$1.50 (+2.99%)
Volume$499.08K
Net Assets1.55B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$30.94
Change+$0.34 (+1.11%)
Volume$24.47K
Net Assets146.85M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.55B vs. PGJ (147M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (31.234) vs PGJ (19.466). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) and PGJ (0.67) have comparable expense ratios . CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 31.234 | 19.466 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 147M | 1,056% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.67 | 97% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 25.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 1.63 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +2.99% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.61% |
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 86% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | +3.56% | ||
| BILI - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||