Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.23
Change+$0.33 (+0.64%)
Volume$1.18M
Net Assets2.85B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$29.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.62%)
Volume$26.79K
Net Assets135.09M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and PGJ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.85B vs. PGJ (135M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (32.631) vs PGJ (15.284). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.70). CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 32.631 | 15.284 | 214% |
| Net Assets | 2.85B | 135M | 2,109% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 25.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 2.78 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 82% Closely correlated | +1.45% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BIDU - PGJ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 73% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ATHM - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
More | ||||