Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs PGJ
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs PGJ
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.33
Change-$0.17 (-0.32%)
Volume$700
Net Assets3.06B
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
Price$28.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.70%)
Volume$100
Net Assets131.44M
CQQQ vs PGJ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. PGJ commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and PGJ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.06B vs. PGJ (131M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PGJ: CQQQ (0.962) vs PGJ (-0.809). CQQQ was incepted earlier than PGJ: CQQQ (16 years) vs PGJ (21 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than PGJ (0.70). CQQQ has a higher turnover PGJ (25.00) vs PGJ (25.00).
| CQQQ | PGJ | CQQQ / PGJ | |
| Gain YTD | 0.962 | -0.809 | -119% |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 131M | 2,335% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 25.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 3.29 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | PGJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OZEM | 35.01 | 0.55 | +1.60% |
| Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF | |||
| TBT | 35.36 | 0.21 | +0.60% |
| ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| PBJA | 30.98 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jan | |||
| GEM | 44.87 | -0.58 | -1.28% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® EMkts Eq ETF | |||
| WDEF | 31.95 | -0.83 | -2.52% |
| WisdomTree Europe Defense Fund | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -3.17% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -6.56% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -4.77% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.97% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
PGJ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGJ has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGJ jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGJ | 100% | -1.99% | ||
| JD - PGJ | 83% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| BABA - PGJ | 81% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| BZ - PGJ | 80% Closely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| VIPS - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| ATHM - PGJ | 72% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||