Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs OBOR
CQQQ vs OBOR Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs OBOR
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.20
Change+$0.30 (+0.58%)
Volume$200
Net Assets2.83B
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF
Price$26.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Volume$718
Net Assets4.02M
CQQQ vs OBOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. OBOR commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and OBOR is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.83B vs. OBOR (4.02M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than OBOR: CQQQ (31.793) vs OBOR (26.402). CQQQ was incepted earlier than OBOR: CQQQ (16 years) vs OBOR (8 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than OBOR (0.79). CQQQ has a higher turnover OBOR (19.00) vs OBOR (19.00).
| CQQQ | OBOR | CQQQ / OBOR | |
| Gain YTD | 31.793 | 26.402 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 4.02M | 70,331% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 19.00 | 226% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 3.15 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCTR | 36.37 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| First Trust Lunt US Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| XCEM | 37.84 | 0.10 | +0.26% |
| Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | |||
| NANC | 46.28 | 0.09 | +0.20% |
| Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF | |||
| SMCY | 8.44 | -0.03 | -0.35% |
| YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| IONX | 27.80 | -1.76 | -5.95% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OBOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBOR | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| ZIM - OBOR | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ARBK - OBOR | 7% Poorly correlated | -6.48% | ||
| ICL - OBOR | 2% Poorly correlated | +3.28% | ||
| ACGP - OBOR | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| ESLT - OBOR | -7% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||