Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs OBOR
CQQQ vs OBOR Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs OBOR
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.20
Change+$0.55 (+1.06%)
Volume$8.52K
Net Assets2.86B
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF
Price$26.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$615
Net Assets3.93M
CQQQ vs OBOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. OBOR commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and OBOR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.86B vs. OBOR (3.93M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than OBOR: CQQQ (31.158) vs OBOR (23.546). CQQQ was incepted earlier than OBOR: CQQQ (16 years) vs OBOR (8 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than OBOR (0.79). CQQQ has a higher turnover OBOR (19.00) vs OBOR (19.00).
| CQQQ | OBOR | CQQQ / OBOR | |
| Gain YTD | 31.158 | 23.546 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 2.86B | 3.93M | 72,693% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 19.00 | 226% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 3.15 | 7% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JANU | 28.30 | 0.24 | +0.86% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF | |||
| SAGP | 34.27 | 0.22 | +0.64% |
| Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF | |||
| RYLD | 15.34 | 0.04 | +0.26% |
| Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | |||
| APXM | 30.78 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffr ETF - Apr | |||
| CWEB | 43.76 | -1.14 | -2.54% |
| Direxion Dly CSI CHN Itnet Bull 2X Shrs | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||
OBOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBOR | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| ZIM - OBOR | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| ARBK - OBOR | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.23% | ||
| ICL - OBOR | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.58% | ||
| ACGP - OBOR | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| ESLT - OBOR | -7% Poorly correlated | +3.15% | ||
More | ||||