Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs NBCE
CQQQ vs NBCE Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs NBCE
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.35
Change-$0.98 (-1.77%)
Volume$4.39K
Net Assets2.77B
Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF
Price$32.10
Change-$1.54 (-4.58%)
Volume$1.5K
Net Assets7.72M
CQQQ vs NBCE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. NBCE commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and NBCE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.77B vs. NBCE (7.72M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than NBCE: CQQQ (40.503) vs NBCE (36.438). CQQQ was incepted earlier than NBCE: CQQQ (16 years) vs NBCE (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than NBCE (0.76). NBCE has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | NBCE | CQQQ / NBCE | |
| Gain YTD | 40.503 | 36.438 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 7.72M | 35,881% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.76 | 86% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 231.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.88 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | NBCE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
More | ||||
NBCE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NBCE and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NBCE and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBCE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBCE | 100% | N/A | ||
| YUMC - NBCE | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.68% |