Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.26
Change-$0.67 (-1.22%)
Volume$4.94K
Net Assets3.02B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$34.18
Change+$0.30 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71M
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.02B vs. MCHS (2.71M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: CQQQ (39.487) vs MCHS (32.564). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCHS (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 39.487 | 32.564 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 3.02B | 2.71M | 111,504% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 115.31 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 4.17 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGQ | 96.12 | 7.50 | +8.46% |
| ProShares Ultra Silver | |||
| QHDG | 29.81 | 0.26 | +0.89% |
| Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF | |||
| USNZ | 43.45 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| Xtrackers Net Zero Pwy Par Alg US Eq ETF | |||
| FCSH | 24.43 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Federated Hermes Short Duration Corp ETF | |||
| SMN | 14.12 | -0.21 | -1.46% |
| ProShares UltraShort Materials | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.84% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.24% |