Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCHS
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCHS
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.26
Change-$1.96 (-3.61%)
Volume$1.6K
Net Assets3.06B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$36.33
Change-$0.31 (-0.85%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.93M
CQQQ vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCHS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.06B vs. MCHS (2.93M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: MCHS (9.392) vs CQQQ (4.269). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCHS: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCHS (2 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover CQQQ (37.00) vs CQQQ (37.00).
| CQQQ | MCHS | CQQQ / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.269 | 9.392 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 2.93M | 104,474% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.89 | 73% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 115.31 | 32% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 3.21 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | N/A | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.09% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.02% |