Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.28
Change-$0.65 (-1.18%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets2.99B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$29.83
Change+$0.06 (+0.20%)
Volume$926
Net Assets24.33M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.99B vs. MCH (24.3M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: CQQQ (39.487) vs MCH (35.034). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 39.487 | 35.034 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 24.3M | 12,321% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 0.97 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.84% | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||