Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$57.10
Change-$1.14 (-1.96%)
Volume$3.68M
Net Assets2.24B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$29.51
Change-$0.20 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.26K
Net Assets23.64M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.24B vs. MCH (23.6M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than MCH: CQQQ (44.997) vs MCH (33.844). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 44.997 | 33.844 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 23.6M | 9,470% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 1.03 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.19% |
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCH and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCH and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.32% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TCOM - MCH | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
More | ||||