Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$47.42
Change+$0.23 (+0.49%)
Volume$525
Net Assets1.26B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$26.60
Change+$0.19 (+0.72%)
Volume$200
Net Assets22.26M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.26B vs. MCH (22.3M). CQQQ (19.832) and MCH (19.773) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 19.832 | 19.773 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 22.3M | 5,664% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 1.18 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 90% | 30 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.40% |
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| QFIN - MCH | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.01% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| BEKE - MCH | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||