Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$42.33
Change-$0.92 (-2.13%)
Volume$142.06K
Net Assets996.1M
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$23.92
Change-$0.43 (-1.77%)
Volume$194
Net Assets20.24M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and MCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 996M vs. MCH (20.2M). MCH has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: MCH (8.502) vs CQQQ (7.491). CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 7.491 | 8.502 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 996M | 20.2M | 4,931% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 1.24 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -2.13% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| DADA - CQQQ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 45% Loosely correlated | -8.42% |
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| QFIN - MCH | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 30% Poorly correlated | +3.19% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| YUMC - MCH | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.42% | ||
| BEKE - MCH | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
More | ||||