Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs MCH
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs MCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.23
Change+$0.33 (+0.64%)
Volume$1.18M
Net Assets2.83B
Matthews China Active ETF
Price$28.86
Change+$0.26 (+0.91%)
Volume$4.42K
Net Assets23M
CQQQ vs MCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. MCH commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and MCH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.83B vs. MCH (23M). CQQQ (31.793) and MCH (30.884) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than MCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs MCH (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than MCH (0.79). MCH has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | MCH | CQQQ / MCH | |
| Gain YTD | 31.793 | 30.884 | 103% |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 23M | 12,296% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.79 | 82% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 55.22 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 1.01 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | MCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCH has been loosely correlated with LKNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCH jumps, then LKNCY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCH | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| LKNCY - MCH | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| DIDIY - MCH | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BILI - MCH | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HTHT - MCH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| PDD - MCH | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||