Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KWEB
CQQQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KWEB
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$51.97
Change+$0.29 (+0.56%)
Volume$800
Net Assets1.55B
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$38.87
Change+$0.43 (+1.12%)
Volume$12.82K
Net Assets8.55B
CQQQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KWEB commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and KWEB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 8.55B vs. CQQQ (1.55B). KWEB (31.464) and CQQQ (31.234) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CQQQ (16 years) vs KWEB (12 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | KWEB | CQQQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 31.234 | 31.464 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 1.55B | 8.55B | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 54.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 2.74 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 29 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +2.99% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 70% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.61% |
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +1.32% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 78% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| PDD - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| ATHM - KWEB | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||