Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KWEB
CQQQ vs KWEB Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KWEB
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$57.10
Change-$1.14 (-1.96%)
Volume$3.68M
Net Assets2.24B
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$41.07
Change-$0.61 (-1.46%)
Volume$20.63M
Net Assets9.42B
CQQQ vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KWEB commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and KWEB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 9.42B vs. CQQQ (2.24B). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: CQQQ (44.997) vs KWEB (40.458). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KWEB: CQQQ (16 years) vs KWEB (12 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). KWEB has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | KWEB | CQQQ / KWEB | |
| Gain YTD | 44.997 | 40.458 | 111% |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 9.42B | 24% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.70 | 93% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 54.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 2.74 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.19% |
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| BZ - KWEB | 78% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| PDD - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| BEKE - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ATHM - KWEB | 75% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 74% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||