Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KURE
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KURE
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$46.65
Change+$0.31 (+0.67%)
Volume$241
Net Assets1.2B
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
Price$18.92
Change+$0.20 (+1.07%)
Volume$300
Net Assets103.46M
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KURE commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and KURE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.2B vs. KURE (103M). KURE has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: KURE (31.917) vs CQQQ (17.674). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KURE: CQQQ (16 years) vs KURE (7 years). CQQQ (0.65) and KURE (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . KURE has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | KURE | CQQQ / KURE | |
| Gain YTD | 17.674 | 31.917 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 103M | 1,161% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 77.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 1.09 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 90% | 26 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.40% |
KURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KURE and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KURE and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KURE | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| LEGN - KURE | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.54% |