Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KURE
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KURE
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.34
Change-$0.99 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.7M
Net Assets2.89B
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
Price$19.65
Change-$0.18 (-0.91%)
Volume$11.94K
Net Assets105.31M
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KURE commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and KURE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.89B vs. KURE (105M). KURE (38.471) and CQQQ (37.989) have matching annual dividend yield . CQQQ was incepted earlier than KURE: CQQQ (16 years) vs KURE (8 years). CQQQ (0.65) and KURE (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . KURE has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | KURE | CQQQ / KURE | |
| Gain YTD | 37.989 | 38.471 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 105M | 2,751% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 77.00 | 56% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 0.88 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
KURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KURE and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KURE and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KURE | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| LEGN - KURE | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.24% | ||
| BNR - KURE | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| IMAB - KURE | -0% Poorly correlated | -12.04% | ||
| HCM - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| ONC - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||