Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KURE
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KURE
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$52.26
Change-$1.96 (-3.61%)
Volume$1.6K
Net Assets3.06B
KraneShares MSCI All China Hlth Care ETF
Price$17.48
Change-$3.18 (-15.39%)
Volume$30.66K
Net Assets79.16M
CQQQ vs KURE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KURE commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and KURE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 3.06B vs. KURE (79.2M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KURE: CQQQ (4.269) vs KURE (2.582). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KURE: CQQQ (16 years) vs KURE (8 years). CQQQ (0.65) and KURE (0.65) have comparable expense ratios . KURE has a higher turnover CQQQ (37.00) vs CQQQ (37.00).
| CQQQ | KURE | CQQQ / KURE | |
| Gain YTD | 4.269 | 2.582 | 165% |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 79.2M | 3,862% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 77.00 | 48% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 4.01 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 23 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QVOY | 28.40 | 0.33 | +1.18% |
| Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF | |||
| OMFS | 47.83 | 0.18 | +0.38% |
| Invesco Russell 2000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| CGIC | 34.79 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Capital Group International Cor Eq ETF | |||
| VTWG | 247.12 | -0.63 | -0.25% |
| Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | |||
| BTCC | 18.20 | -0.44 | -2.36% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.50% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -3.33% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
More | ||||
KURE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KURE and LEGN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KURE and LEGN's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KURE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KURE | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| LEGN - KURE | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.86% | ||
| BNR - KURE | 2% Poorly correlated | -15.00% | ||
| NBP - KURE | -0% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
| HCM - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| ONC - KURE | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||