Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs KLIP
CQQQ vs KLIP Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs KLIP
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$57.12
Change-$1.12 (-1.92%)
Volume$25.62K
Net Assets2.02B
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF
Price$33.39
Change-$0.09 (-0.27%)
Volume$400
Net Assets118.65M
CQQQ vs KLIP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. KLIP commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and KLIP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.02B vs. KLIP (119M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than KLIP: CQQQ (47.892) vs KLIP (21.471). CQQQ was incepted earlier than KLIP: CQQQ (16 years) vs KLIP (3 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than KLIP (0.95). KLIP has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | KLIP | CQQQ / KLIP | |
| Gain YTD | 47.892 | 21.471 | 223% |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 119M | 1,697% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.95 | 68% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 424.00 | 10% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 32.57 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.33% |