Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs GXC
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GXC
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$57.10
Change-$1.14 (-1.96%)
Volume$3.68M
Net Assets2.24B
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$102.48
Change-$0.83 (-0.80%)
Volume$8.32K
Net Assets491.54M
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GXC commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and GXC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.24B vs. GXC (492M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than GXC: CQQQ (44.997) vs GXC (36.656). CQQQ was incepted earlier than GXC: CQQQ (16 years) vs GXC (19 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| CQQQ | GXC | CQQQ / GXC | |
| Gain YTD | 44.997 | 36.656 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 492M | 454% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 24.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 2.57 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.96% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.19% |
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 72% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| WB - GXC | 69% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ATHM - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| PDD - GXC | 67% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||