Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs GXC
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GXC
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$43.56
Change+$0.30 (+0.69%)
Volume$149.44K
Net Assets1.09B
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$87.12
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
Volume$9.97K
Net Assets429.2M
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GXC commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and GXC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.09B vs. GXC (429M). GXC has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: GXC (16.174) vs CQQQ (10.615). CQQQ was incepted earlier than GXC: CQQQ (16 years) vs GXC (18 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| CQQQ | GXC | CQQQ / GXC | |
| Gain YTD | 10.615 | 16.174 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 429M | 253% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 24.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 2.86 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 25 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.81% |
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| WB - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 71% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| YUMC - GXC | 66% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| IQ - GXC | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||