Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs GXC
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GXC
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$42.33
Change-$0.92 (-2.13%)
Volume$142.06K
Net Assets996.1M
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$86.88
Change-$1.46 (-1.65%)
Volume$16.33K
Net Assets428.73M
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GXC commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and GXC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 996M vs. GXC (429M). GXC has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: GXC (14.497) vs CQQQ (7.491). CQQQ was incepted earlier than GXC: CQQQ (16 years) vs GXC (18 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| CQQQ | GXC | CQQQ / GXC | |
| Gain YTD | 7.491 | 14.497 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 996M | 429M | 232% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 24.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.27 | 2.51 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% | 19 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -2.13% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| DADA - CQQQ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 45% Loosely correlated | -8.42% |
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| WB - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BEKE - GXC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| BZ - GXC | 68% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| YUMC - GXC | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| NOAH - GXC | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
More | ||||