Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs GXC
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs GXC
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.34
Change-$0.99 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.7M
Net Assets2.89B
SPDR® S&P China ETF
Price$100.99
Change-$0.46 (-0.45%)
Volume$19.19K
Net Assets489.32M
CQQQ vs GXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. GXC commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and GXC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.89B vs. GXC (489M). CQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than GXC: CQQQ (37.989) vs GXC (34.669). CQQQ was incepted earlier than GXC: CQQQ (16 years) vs GXC (19 years). GXC (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover GXC (24.00) vs GXC (24.00).
| CQQQ | GXC | CQQQ / GXC | |
| Gain YTD | 37.989 | 34.669 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 2.89B | 489M | 591% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 24.00 | 179% |
| Yield | 0.19 | 2.37 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LGMNX | 27.05 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| Loomis Sayles Global Allocation N | |||
| TRMNX | 23.36 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index | |||
| MGRVX | 50.47 | -0.13 | -0.26% |
| MFS International Growth R4 | |||
| WCMEX | 19.28 | -0.05 | -0.26% |
| WCM Focused Emerging Markets Instl | |||
| MSSCX | 9.38 | -0.04 | -0.42% |
| AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth I | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 68% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
GXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GXC has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GXC jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXC | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| JD - GXC | 80% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| BILI - GXC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| BABA - GXC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| BIDU - GXC | 74% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ATHM - GXC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||