Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLTW
CQQQ vs FLTW Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLTW
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$43.56
Change+$0.30 (+0.69%)
Volume$149.44K
Net Assets1.09B
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
Price$54.18
Change+$0.74 (+1.38%)
Volume$27.81K
Net Assets560.93M
CQQQ vs FLTW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLTW commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and FLTW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.09B vs. FLTW (561M). FLTW has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FLTW (14.679) vs CQQQ (10.615). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLTW: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLTW (8 years). FLTW (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLTW (12.14) vs FLTW (12.14).
| CQQQ | FLTW | CQQQ / FLTW | |
| Gain YTD | 10.615 | 14.679 | 72% |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 561M | 193% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.19 | 342% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 12.14 | 354% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 1.47 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JRANX | 93.30 | 1.18 | +1.28% |
| Janus Henderson Research N | |||
| GEIYX | 17.44 | 0.20 | +1.16% |
| GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Idx Instl | |||
| RYTRX | 7.58 | 0.06 | +0.80% |
| Royce Small-Cap Total Return Invmt | |||
| JORNX | 20.21 | 0.13 | +0.65% |
| Janus Henderson Global Select T | |||
| GLNBX | 21.86 | 0.08 | +0.37% |
| MFS Global New Discovery B | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.15% |