Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FLCH
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FLCH
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$43.56
Change+$0.30 (+0.69%)
Volume$149.44K
Net Assets1.09B
Franklin FTSE China ETF
Price$21.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.32%)
Volume$23.93K
Net Assets198.17M
CQQQ vs FLCH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FLCH commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and FLCH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 1.09B vs. FLCH (198M). FLCH has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FLCH (18.180) vs CQQQ (10.615). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FLCH: CQQQ (16 years) vs FLCH (8 years). FLCH (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ has a higher turnover FLCH (9.59) vs FLCH (9.59).
| CQQQ | FLCH | CQQQ / FLCH | |
| Gain YTD | 10.615 | 18.180 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 198M | 548% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.19 | 342% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 9.59 | 448% |
| Yield | 0.25 | 2.80 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FLCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 26 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PDD - CQQQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TUYA - CQQQ | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.81% |
FLCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLCH has been closely correlated with BEKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLCH jumps, then BEKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLCH | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BEKE - FLCH | 72% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BZ - FLCH | 68% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| WB - FLCH | 67% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| IQ - FLCH | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| YMM - FLCH | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||