Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CQQQ vs FCA
CQQQ vs FCA Comparison
Open Charts CQQQ vs FCA
Invesco China Technology ETF
Price$54.28
Change-$0.65 (-1.18%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets2.99B
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$29.75
Change+$0.12 (+0.40%)
Volume$5.9K
Net Assets62.92M
CQQQ vs FCA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CQQQ vs. FCA commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a Hold and FCA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQQQ has more net assets: 2.99B vs. FCA (62.9M). FCA has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: FCA (51.491) vs CQQQ (39.487). CQQQ was incepted earlier than FCA: CQQQ (16 years) vs FCA (15 years). CQQQ (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than FCA (0.80). FCA has a higher turnover CQQQ (43.00) vs CQQQ (43.00).
| CQQQ | FCA | CQQQ / FCA | |
| Gain YTD | 39.487 | 51.491 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 62.9M | 4,760% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.80 | 81% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 62.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 2.26 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CQQQ | FCA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AGQ | 96.12 | 7.50 | +8.46% |
| ProShares Ultra Silver | |||
| QHDG | 29.81 | 0.26 | +0.89% |
| Innovator Hedged Nasdaq-100 ETF | |||
| USNZ | 43.45 | 0.04 | +0.09% |
| Xtrackers Net Zero Pwy Par Alg US Eq ETF | |||
| FCSH | 24.43 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Federated Hermes Short Duration Corp ETF | |||
| SMN | 14.12 | -0.21 | -1.46% |
| ProShares UltraShort Materials | |||
CQQQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ATHM - CQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| WB - CQQQ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.84% | ||
More | ||||