CQP
Price
$55.03
Change
-$0.20 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
23.91B
4 days until earnings call
WMB
Price
$57.82
Change
-$0.93 (-1.58%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
47.36B
8 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs WMB

Header iconCQP vs WMB Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs WMBBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$55.03
Change-$0.20 (-0.36%)
Volume$148.02K
Capitalization23.91B
Williams Companies
Price$57.82
Change-$0.93 (-1.58%)
Volume$4.96M
Capitalization47.36B
CQP vs WMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. WMB commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and WMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $55.03 vs. WMB: $57.82)
Brand notoriety: CQP and WMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 80% vs. WMB: 60%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $23.91B vs. WMB: $47.36B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $23.91B. WMB’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $47.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $76.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $10.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and WMB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than WMB.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

WMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.92% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMB($47.4B) has a higher market cap than CQP($23.9B). WMB has higher P/E ratio than CQP: WMB (14.50) vs CQP (7.11). WMB YTD gains are higher at: 8.701 vs. CQP (6.512). WMB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.71B vs. CQP (5.75B). WMB has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. CQP (575M). CQP has less debt than WMB: CQP (16B) vs WMB (26.5B). WMB has higher revenues than CQP: WMB (10.9B) vs CQP (9.66B).
CQPWMBCQP / WMB
Capitalization23.9B47.4B50%
EBITDA5.75B7.71B75%
Gain YTD6.5128.70175%
P/E Ratio7.1114.5049%
Revenue9.66B10.9B89%
Total Cash575M2.15B27%
Total Debt16B26.5B60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs WMB: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
WMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5556
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
192
SMR RATING
1..100
1049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3611
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMB's Valuation (80) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (81). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (19). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMB (49). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMB’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (60). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (36). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPWMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APLY13.300.10
+0.76%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
DIVO43.240.12
+0.28%
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
GXUS50.69N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
EFFI22.89N/A
N/A
Harbor Osmosis International Resource Efficient ETF
BCIL30.15-0.19
-0.63%
Bancreek International Large Cap ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
+3.05%
MPLX - CQP
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
LNG - CQP
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GLP - CQP
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
HESM - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
WMB - CQP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More

WMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMB
1D Price
Change %
WMB100%
-1.58%
KMI - WMB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
DTM - WMB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
TRGP - WMB
74%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
OKE - WMB
73%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
AM - WMB
70%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
More