CQP
Price
$55.86
Change
+$0.16 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.96B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNG
Price
$202.83
Change
+$3.11 (+1.56%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.99B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs LNG

Header iconCQP vs LNG Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs LNGBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$55.86
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
Volume$100
Capitalization26.96B
Cheniere Energy
Price$202.83
Change+$3.11 (+1.56%)
Volume$17.6K
Capitalization42.99B
CQP vs LNG Comparison Chart in %
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. LNG commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Hold and LNG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CQP: $55.70 vs. LNG: $199.72)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. LNG: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 68% vs. LNG: 167%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $26.96B vs. LNG: $42.99B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $26.96B. LNG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $42.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $101.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LNG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than LNG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than LNG.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +5.09% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

LNG is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.27% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNG($43B) has a higher market cap than CQP($27B). CQP has higher P/E ratio than LNG: CQP (14.54) vs LNG (11.15). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 4.151 vs. LNG (2.742). LNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.49B vs. CQP (3.77B). LNG has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. CQP (121M). CQP has less debt than LNG: CQP (14.8B) vs LNG (25.2B). LNG has higher revenues than CQP: LNG (19B) vs CQP (10.3B).
CQPLNGCQP / LNG
Capitalization27B43B63%
EBITDA3.77B8.49B44%
Gain YTD4.1512.742151%
P/E Ratio14.5411.15130%
Revenue10.3B19B54%
Total Cash121M1.08B11%
Total Debt14.8B25.2B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs LNG: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
LNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1515
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2319
SMR RATING
1..100
1016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CQP's Valuation (53) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNG (89). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (23). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (16). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (63). This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNG (83). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEA15.010.08
+0.54%
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
DJP39.640.14
+0.35%
iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN
CEE17.64-0.05
-0.28%
Central and Eastern Europe Fund (The)
SCHK33.29-0.16
-0.48%
Schwab 1000 ETF
QGRD26.87-0.25
-0.93%
Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
+1.79%
LNG - CQP
69%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
GLP - CQP
68%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
OKE - CQP
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
MPLX - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
HESM - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
More

LNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNG
1D Price
Change %
LNG100%
+3.11%
OKE - LNG
69%
Closely correlated
+2.15%
CQP - LNG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
KMI - LNG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
WMB - LNG
66%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
TRGP - LNG
66%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
More