CQP
Price
$52.14
Change
-$0.25 (-0.48%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
25.24B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GLP
Price
$42.36
Change
+$0.94 (+2.27%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
105 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs GLP

Header iconCQP vs GLP Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs GLPBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$52.14
Change-$0.25 (-0.48%)
Volume$204.98K
Capitalization25.24B
Global Partners
Price$42.36
Change+$0.94 (+2.27%)
Volume$74.46K
Capitalization1.43B
CQP vs GLP Comparison Chart in %
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. GLP commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and GLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $52.39 vs. GLP: $41.42)
Brand notoriety: CQP and GLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 167% vs. GLP: 108%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $25.24B vs. GLP: $1.43B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $25.24B. GLP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $1.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than GLP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the short-term than GLP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.05% price change this week, while GLP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

GLP is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+0.76% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($25.2B) has a higher market cap than GLP($1.43B). GLP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: GLP (20.37) vs CQP (13.61). CQP YTD gains are higher at: 4.625 vs. GLP (-5.371). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. GLP (379M). GLP has less debt than CQP: GLP (2.01B) vs CQP (14.8B). GLP has higher revenues than CQP: GLP (18.1B) vs CQP (10.3B).
CQPGLPCQP / GLP
Capitalization25.2B1.43B1,759%
EBITDA3.77B379M996%
Gain YTD4.625-5.371-86%
P/E Ratio13.6120.3767%
Revenue10.3B18.1B57%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.8B2.01B738%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs GLP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
GLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6263
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2623
SMR RATING
1..100
1093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5476
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLP's Valuation (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (66) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (26) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLP (93) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than GLP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as GLP (76) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to GLP’s over the last 12 months.

GLP's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as CQP (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that GLP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPGLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GLP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYY166.260.09
+0.05%
iShares Dow Jones US ETF
WTMY25.55N/A
N/A
WisdomTree High Income Ldrd Muncpl
TFLR51.49N/A
-0.01%
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
PFFR18.41-0.01
-0.03%
InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF
SKF26.86-0.49
-1.78%
ProShares UltraShort Financials

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with GLP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then GLP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-2.07%
GLP - CQP
67%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
LNG - CQP
66%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
MPLX - CQP
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
OKE - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
EPD - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
More

GLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLP has been loosely correlated with CQP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLP jumps, then CQP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLP
1D Price
Change %
GLP100%
-1.33%
CQP - GLP
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
MPLX - GLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
EPD - GLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
PAA - GLP
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
ET - GLP
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
More