CQP
Price
$56.99
Change
+$4.93 (+9.47%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
27.59B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GEL
Price
$17.18
Change
+$1.77 (+11.49%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs GEL

Header iconCQP vs GEL Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs GELBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$56.99
Change+$4.93 (+9.47%)
Volume$95.07K
Capitalization27.59B
Genesis Energy
Price$17.18
Change+$1.77 (+11.49%)
Volume$299.67K
Capitalization2.1B
CQP vs GEL Comparison Chart in %
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. GEL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a Buy and GEL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CQP: $56.99 vs. GEL: $17.18)
Brand notoriety: CQP and GEL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 101% vs. GEL: 117%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $27.59B vs. GEL: $2.1B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $27.59B. GEL’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $107.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $13.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGEL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GEL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than GEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GEL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GEL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GEL is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.74% price change this week, while GEL (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

GEL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.89% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($27.6B) has a higher market cap than GEL($2.1B). GEL has higher P/E ratio than CQP: GEL (39.62) vs CQP (14.88). GEL YTD gains are higher at: 11.285 vs. CQP (6.563). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. GEL (512M). GEL has less debt than CQP: GEL (3.1B) vs CQP (14.8B). CQP has higher revenues than GEL: CQP (10.3B) vs GEL (2.89B).
CQPGELCQP / GEL
Capitalization27.6B2.1B1,312%
EBITDA3.77B512M737%
Gain YTD6.56311.28558%
P/E Ratio14.8839.6238%
Revenue10.3B2.89B356%
Total Cash121MN/A-
Total Debt14.8B3.1B478%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs GEL: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
GEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2313
SMR RATING
1..100
1098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GEL's Valuation (31) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (33). This means that GEL’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

GEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (23). This means that GEL’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is significantly better than the same rating for GEL (98). This means that CQP’s stock grew significantly faster than GEL’s over the last 12 months.

GEL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (53). This means that GEL’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GEL (99). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than GEL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPGEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCDL3.000.12
+4.12%
GraniteShares 2x Long LCID Daily ETF
MUA11.120.01
+0.09%
Blackrock Muni Assets Fund
IBIG26.180.02
+0.08%
iShares iBonds Oct 2030 Term Tips ETF
AETH35.05N/A
+0.01%
Bitwise Trendwise Eth & TreasRotStgyETF
JTEK85.74-2.61
-2.95%
JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
+1.79%
LNG - CQP
68%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
GLP - CQP
68%
Closely correlated
+2.15%
MPLX - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
OKE - CQP
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.92%
HESM - CQP
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More

GEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GEL has been loosely correlated with AM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GEL jumps, then AM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GEL
1D Price
Change %
GEL100%
+4.82%
AM - GEL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
PAGP - GEL
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
HESM - GEL
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
EPD - GEL
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.62%
CQP - GEL
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More