LHX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CPZ | LHX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 16 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.46% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.29% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with GD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then GD could also see price increases.