Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPZ vs FFLS
CPZ vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPZ vs. FFLS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPZ is a Buy and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 326M vs. FFLS (40M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CPZ (11.495) vs FFLS (7.363). CPZ was incepted earlier than FFLS: CPZ (6 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). FFLS has a higher turnover CPZ (249.00) vs CPZ (249.00).
| CPZ | FFLS | CPZ / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.495 | 7.363 | 156% |
| Net Assets | 326M | 40M | 815% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.24 | 149% |
| Turnover | 249.00 | 313.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 1.59 | 0.16 | 1,005% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CPZ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FFNAX | 14.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% A | |||
| GREUX | 11.75 | -0.14 | -1.18% |
| Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities R6 | |||
| PJGCX | 15.24 | -0.23 | -1.49% |
| PGIM Jennison Focused Value C | |||
| DFUSX | 44.74 | -0.75 | -1.65% |
| DFA US Large Company I | |||
| NWCAX | 62.74 | -1.31 | -2.05% |
| Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG A | |||
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.95% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -4.15% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.34% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||