Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPZ vs FFLS
CPZ vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPZ vs. FFLS commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPZ is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPZ has more net assets: 322M vs. FFLS (40.3M). CPZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CPZ (7.589) vs FFLS (6.160). CPZ was incepted earlier than FFLS: CPZ (6 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CPZ (1.85). FFLS has a higher turnover CPZ (249.00) vs CPZ (249.00).
| CPZ | FFLS | CPZ / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.589 | 6.160 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 322M | 40.3M | 799% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 1.24 | 149% |
| Turnover | 249.00 | 313.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.16 | 1,064% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CPZ | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEFRX | 9.37 | 0.05 | +0.54% |
| Templeton Foreign R | |||
| GMAGX | 13.87 | 0.04 | +0.29% |
| Invesco Advantage International R5 | |||
| DTLGX | 52.63 | N/A | N/A |
| Wilshire Large Company Growth Invmt | |||
| MLINX | 8.30 | -0.02 | -0.24% |
| NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class | |||
| GTTUX | 62.92 | -1.32 | -2.05% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts R6 | |||
CPZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPZ | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -10.83% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
More | ||||