CPXWF
Price
$40.44
Change
+$0.18 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
HRNNF
Price
$35.55
Change
-$0.18 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
17.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPXWF vs HRNNF

Header iconCPXWF vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts CPXWF vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
Capital Power
Price$40.44
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
Volume$2.94K
Capitalization3.68B
Hydro One
Price$35.55
Change-$0.18 (-0.50%)
Volume$515
Capitalization17.73B
CPXWF vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPXWF vs. HRNNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPXWF is a StrongBuy and HRNNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CPXWF: $40.44 vs. HRNNF: $35.55)
Brand notoriety: CPXWF and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPXWF: 12% vs. HRNNF: 2%
Market capitalization -- CPXWF: $3.68B vs. HRNNF: $17.73B
CPXWF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $3.68B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $17.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPXWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPXWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the long-term than HRNNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPXWF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPXWF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPXWF is a better buy in the short-term than HRNNF.

Price Growth

CPXWF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -2.21% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.89% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($17.7B) has a higher market cap than CPXWF($3.68B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than CPXWF: HRNNF (22.16) vs CPXWF (18.45). HRNNF YTD gains are higher at: 16.294 vs. CPXWF (-9.252). HRNNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.57B vs. CPXWF (1.06B). CPXWF has more cash in the bank: 245M vs. HRNNF (31M). CPXWF has less debt than HRNNF: CPXWF (3.62B) vs HRNNF (14.5B). HRNNF has higher revenues than CPXWF: HRNNF (7.58B) vs CPXWF (3.57B).
CPXWFHRNNFCPXWF / HRNNF
Capitalization3.68B17.7B21%
EBITDA1.06B2.57B41%
Gain YTD-9.25216.294-57%
P/E Ratio18.4522.1683%
Revenue3.57B7.58B47%
Total Cash245M31M790%
Total Debt3.62B14.5B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPXWF vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
CPXWF
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
349
SMR RATING
1..100
5568
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1645
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
751

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXWF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRNNF (70). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXWF (34). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to CPXWF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (68). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (54). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

CPXWF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (45). This means that CPXWF’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPXWFHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPXWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTN4.920.05
+1.03%
Gray Media Inc
SFBC47.180.07
+0.15%
Sound Financial Bancorp
MGM37.59-0.08
-0.21%
MGM Resorts International
TALO8.67-0.12
-1.37%
Talos Energy
VMAR6.87-0.61
-8.16%
Vision Marine Technologies Inc

CPXWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPXWF has been loosely correlated with ACLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPXWF jumps, then ACLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXWF
1D Price
Change %
CPXWF100%
+0.44%
ACLLF - CPXWF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CDUAF - CPXWF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
EDPFY - CPXWF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
HRNNF - CPXWF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWEOY - CPXWF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with ACLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then ACLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
N/A
ACLLF - HRNNF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CDUAF - HRNNF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
CPXWF - HRNNF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
ENGIY - HRNNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
EDPFY - HRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More