CPXGF
Price
$7.77
Change
+$0.03 (+0.39%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
495.96M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSGS
Price
$259.12
Change
+$2.16 (+0.84%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.23B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPXGF vs MSGS

Header iconCPXGF vs MSGS Comparison
Open Charts CPXGF vs MSGSBanner chart's image
Cineplex
Price$7.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.39%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization495.96M
Madison Square Garden Sports
Price$259.12
Change+$2.16 (+0.84%)
Volume$97.06K
Capitalization6.23B
CPXGF vs MSGS Comparison Chart in %
CPXGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPXGF vs. MSGS commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPXGF is a Hold and MSGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CPXGF: $7.77 vs. MSGS: $259.12)
Brand notoriety: CPXGF and MSGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPXGF: 20% vs. MSGS: 55%
Market capitalization -- CPXGF: $495.96M vs. MSGS: $6.23B
CPXGF [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $495.96M. MSGS’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $6.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $397.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $12.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPXGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMSGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPXGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSGS is a better buy in the long-term than CPXGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPXGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPXGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MSGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSGS is a better buy in the short-term than CPXGF.

Price Growth

CPXGF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а +0.28% price change this week, while MSGS (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +7.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

MSGS is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (+1.38% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSGS($6.23B) has a higher market cap than CPXGF($496M). MSGS has higher P/E ratio than CPXGF: MSGS (977.00) vs CPXGF (7.26). MSGS YTD gains are higher at: 14.817 vs. CPXGF (-8.760). CPXGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 268M vs. MSGS (4.4M). MSGS has more cash in the bank: 48.6M vs. CPXGF (38.7M). MSGS has less debt than CPXGF: MSGS (1.18B) vs CPXGF (1.81B). CPXGF has higher revenues than MSGS: CPXGF (1.35B) vs MSGS (1.03B).
CPXGFMSGSCPXGF / MSGS
Capitalization496M6.23B8%
EBITDA268M4.4M6,091%
Gain YTD-8.76014.817-59%
P/E Ratio7.26977.001%
Revenue1.35B1.03B131%
Total Cash38.7M48.6M80%
Total Debt1.81B1.18B154%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPXGF vs MSGS: Fundamental Ratings
CPXGF
MSGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
103
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPXGF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MSGS (100). This means that CPXGF’s stock grew similarly to MSGS’s over the last 12 months.

MSGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPXGF (100). This means that MSGS’s stock grew significantly faster than CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSGS's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXGF (100). This means that MSGS’s stock grew similarly to CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSGS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPXGF (77). This means that MSGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSGS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CPXGF (10). This means that MSGS’s stock grew similarly to CPXGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPXGFMSGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPXGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGQX23.030.08
+0.35%
Invesco Growth and Income R5
GCIEX6.910.02
+0.29%
Gabelli Equity Income I
RIDBX25.770.05
+0.19%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
NINAX24.130.02
+0.08%
Neuberger Intrinsic Value A
FTHMX28.58N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behav Md-Cp Eq Inst

CPXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPXGF and NWSA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPXGF and NWSA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPXGF
1D Price
Change %
CPXGF100%
+0.39%
NWSA - CPXGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NWS - CPXGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
MSGS - CPXGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
BATRA - CPXGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
FOX - CPXGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

MSGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSGS has been loosely correlated with BATRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSGS jumps, then BATRA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSGS
1D Price
Change %
MSGS100%
+0.84%
BATRA - MSGS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
SPHR - MSGS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
BATRK - MSGS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
LYV - MSGS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
NWSA - MSGS
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More