CPWHF vs POWL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPWHF is a Hold and POWL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPWHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPWHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- POWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
POWL’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- POWL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CPWHF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -1.40% price change this week, while POWL (@Electrical Products) price change was -14.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
POWL is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (-2.22% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| CPWHF | POWL | CPWHF / POWL | |
| Capitalization | 903M | 1.7B | 53% |
| EBITDA | -33.17M | 95.4M | -35% |
| Gain YTD | -7.826 | 163.955 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 21.41 | - |
| Revenue | 23.4M | 766M | 3% |
| Total Cash | 222M | 355M | 63% |
| Total Debt | 2.63M | 1.22M | 216% |
CPWHF | POWL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 55 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPWHF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as POWL (77) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CPWHF’s stock grew similarly to POWL’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPWHF (100) in the null industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew significantly faster than CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's SMR Rating (41) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPWHF (94) in the null industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPWHF (78) in the null industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.
POWL's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CPWHF (100) in the null industry. This means that POWL’s stock grew similarly to CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.
| POWL | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
CPWHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPWHF and EAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPWHF and EAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPWHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPWHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EAF - CPWHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -7.73% | ||
| ESP - CPWHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| POWL - CPWHF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| FELTY - CPWHF | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| EXROF - CPWHF | 11% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
More | ||||
POWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POWL has been loosely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POWL jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | 100% | -3.85% | ||
| HUBB - POWL | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| VRT - POWL | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.44% | ||
| NVT - POWL | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.59% | ||
| AEIS - POWL | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| ATKR - POWL | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
More | ||||