CPWHF
Price
$1.19
Change
+$0.07 (+6.25%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
903.25M
ILIKF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.04 (+7.84%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
92.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPWHF vs ILIKF

Header iconCPWHF vs ILIKF Comparison
Open Charts CPWHF vs ILIKFBanner chart's image
Ceres Power Holdings
Price$1.19
Change+$0.07 (+6.25%)
Volume$13.55K
Capitalization903.25M
Ilika
Price$0.55
Change+$0.04 (+7.84%)
Volume$24.3K
Capitalization92.93M
CPWHF vs ILIKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPWHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPWHF vs. ILIKF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPWHF is a Hold and ILIKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CPWHF: $1.19 vs. ILIKF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: CPWHF and ILIKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electrical Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPWHF: 251% vs. ILIKF: 54%
Market capitalization -- CPWHF: $903.25M vs. ILIKF: $92.93M
CPWHF [@Electrical Products] is valued at $903.25M. ILIKF’s [@Electrical Products] market capitalization is $92.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $181.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $4.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPWHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileILIKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPWHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ILIKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPWHF is a better buy in the long-term than ILIKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPWHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ILIKF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPWHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ILIKF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ILIKF is a better buy in the short-term than CPWHF.

Price Growth

CPWHF (@Electrical Products) experienced а +6.61% price change this week, while ILIKF (@Electrical Products) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +4.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (+4.99% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPWHF($903M) has a higher market cap than ILIKF($92.9M). ILIKF YTD gains are higher at: 123.361 vs. CPWHF (-42.734). ILIKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.1M vs. CPWHF (-33.17M). CPWHF has more cash in the bank: 222M vs. ILIKF (18.6M). ILIKF has less debt than CPWHF: ILIKF (741K) vs CPWHF (2.63M). CPWHF has higher revenues than ILIKF: CPWHF (23.4M) vs ILIKF (504K).
CPWHFILIKFCPWHF / ILIKF
Capitalization903M92.9M972%
EBITDA-33.17M-8.1M410%
Gain YTD-42.734123.361-35%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue23.4M504K4,643%
Total Cash222M18.6M1,194%
Total Debt2.63M741K354%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPWHF vs ILIKF: Fundamental Ratings
CPWHF
ILIKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPWHF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ILIKF (90). This means that CPWHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ILIKF’s over the last 12 months.

ILIKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CPWHF (100). This means that ILIKF’s stock grew similarly to CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.

CPWHF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as ILIKF (95). This means that CPWHF’s stock grew similarly to ILIKF’s over the last 12 months.

ILIKF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CPWHF (45). This means that ILIKF’s stock grew similarly to CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.

ILIKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CPWHF (100). This means that ILIKF’s stock grew similarly to CPWHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPWHFILIKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPWHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ILIKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TQCCX19.450.11
+0.57%
Touchstone Dividend Equity C
ARCHX18.430.10
+0.55%
Archer Balanced
TAMVX31.730.12
+0.38%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Adv
PURZX20.560.03
+0.15%
PGIM Global Real Estate Z
ECRAX14.720.02
+0.14%
Eaton Vance RBA All Asset Strategy Fd C

CPWHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPWHF and EAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPWHF and EAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPWHF
1D Price
Change %
CPWHF100%
N/A
EAF - CPWHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.78%
ESP - CPWHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
POWL - CPWHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
FELTY - CPWHF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
EXROF - CPWHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
More

ILIKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ILIKF and CPWHF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ILIKF and CPWHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ILIKF
1D Price
Change %
ILIKF100%
+6.86%
CPWHF - ILIKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUWAY - ILIKF
6%
Poorly correlated
+43.39%
HMDPF - ILIKF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
DIALF - ILIKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFGYF - ILIKF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
More