CPS
Price
$32.95
Change
+$0.09 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
581.14M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DAN
Price
$27.71
Change
+$0.65 (+2.40%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPS vs DAN

Header iconCPS vs DAN Comparison
Open Charts CPS vs DANBanner chart's image
Cooper-Standard Automotive
Price$32.95
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
Volume$239.34K
Capitalization581.14M
Dana
Price$27.71
Change+$0.65 (+2.40%)
Volume$2.21M
Capitalization3.24B
CPS vs DAN Comparison Chart in %
CPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPS vs. DAN commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPS is a Hold and DAN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (CPS: $32.95 vs. DAN: $27.71)
Brand notoriety: CPS and DAN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPS: 144% vs. DAN: 120%
Market capitalization -- CPS: $581.14M vs. DAN: $3.24B
CPS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $581.14M. DAN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $79.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPS and DAN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAN is a better buy in the short-term than CPS.

Price Growth

CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while DAN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

DAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.09% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAN($3.24B) has a higher market cap than CPS($581M). DAN has higher P/E ratio than CPS: DAN (62.98) vs CPS (17.53). DAN YTD gains are higher at: 16.625 vs. CPS (0.366). DAN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 801M vs. CPS (222M). DAN has more cash in the bank: 414M vs. CPS (148M). CPS has less debt than DAN: CPS (1.19B) vs DAN (3.53B). DAN has higher revenues than CPS: DAN (9.96B) vs CPS (2.73B).
CPSDANCPS / DAN
Capitalization581M3.24B18%
EBITDA222M801M28%
Gain YTD0.36616.6252%
P/E Ratio17.5362.9828%
Revenue2.73B9.96B27%
Total Cash148M414M36%
Total Debt1.19B3.53B34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPS vs DAN: Fundamental Ratings
CPS
DAN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6628
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10065
SMR RATING
1..100
10086
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DAN's Valuation (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (63). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (100). This means that DAN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's SMR Rating (86) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (100). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

DAN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (39). This means that DAN’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAN (87). This means that CPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPSDAN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DAN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RPMFX16.780.21
+1.27%
Reinhart Genesis PMV Advisor
IUENX31.070.24
+0.78%
JPMorgan International Focus R6
FNPSX37.920.24
+0.64%
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Svc
BUIDX35.160.09
+0.26%
Buffalo Growth & Income Inst
DHLRX32.620.07
+0.22%
Diamond Hill Large Cap I

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
+0.27%
AXL - CPS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
DAN - CPS
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
APTV - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
LEA - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
VC - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More

DAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DAN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAN
1D Price
Change %
DAN100%
+2.40%
ALV - DAN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
LEA - DAN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
APTV - DAN
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
SMP - DAN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
BWA - DAN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More