CPNFF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
114.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DGDCF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.04 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPNFF vs DGDCF

Header iconCPNFF vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts CPNFF vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Euro Sun Mining
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.03K
Capitalization114.19M
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.12
Change-$0.04 (-25.00%)
Volume$115.05K
Capitalization8.61M
CPNFF vs DGDCF Comparison Chart in %
CPNFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNFF vs. DGDCF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNFF is a Hold and DGDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CPNFF: $0.27 vs. DGDCF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: CPNFF and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNFF: 20% vs. DGDCF: 539%
Market capitalization -- CPNFF: $114.19M vs. DGDCF: $8.61M
CPNFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $114.19M. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $144.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPNFF and DGDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGDCF is a better buy in the short-term than CPNFF.

Price Growth

CPNFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -2.66% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.95% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNFF($114M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($8.61M). CPNFF YTD gains are higher at: 9.159 vs. DGDCF (-16.326). DGDCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -611.68K vs. CPNFF (-3.62M). DGDCF has more cash in the bank: 3.14M vs. CPNFF (1.23M). CPNFF (0) and DGDCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CPNFFDGDCFCPNFF / DGDCF
Capitalization114M8.61M1,325%
EBITDA-3.62M-611.68K591%
Gain YTD9.159-16.326-56%
P/E Ratio16.27N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.23M3.14M39%
Total Debt2.53MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPNFF vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
CPNFF
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9028
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9270
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPNFF (83). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (92). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (44). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DGDCF (100). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew significantly faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNFFDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPNFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DGDCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTRRY8.180.18
+2.25%
PRIO S A
AAVVF7.930.11
+1.41%
Advantage Energy Ltd.
CHBH53.60N/A
N/A
Croghan Bancshares, Inc.
CTPCF1.74N/A
N/A
Citic Ltd
FOFA0.35N/A
N/A
Family Office of America Inc.

CPNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPNFF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPNFF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNFF
1D Price
Change %
CPNFF100%
+0.94%
ORZCF - CPNFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
TORXF - CPNFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
VIORF - CPNFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.95%
DGDCF - CPNFF
1%
Poorly correlated
-20.08%
CRCUF - CPNFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.43%

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
-20.08%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
GOLD - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
More