CPNFF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
55.46M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
DGDCF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Oct 10 closing price
Capitalization
11.55M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPNFF vs DGDCF

Header iconCPNFF vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts CPNFF vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Euro Sun Mining
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.98K
Capitalization55.46M
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization11.55M
CPNFF vs DGDCF Comparison Chart in %
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNFF vs. DGDCF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNFF is a Hold and DGDCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CPNFF: $0.14 vs. DGDCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CPNFF and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNFF: 21% vs. DGDCF: 14%
Market capitalization -- CPNFF: $55.46M vs. DGDCF: $11.55M
CPNFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $55.46M. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $11.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CPNFF and DGDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DGDCF is a better buy in the short-term than CPNFF.

Price Growth

CPNFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.22% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -12.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1771.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPNFF($55.5M) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($11.5M). CPNFF YTD gains are higher at: 391.007 vs. DGDCF (68.636). CPNFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 121K vs. DGDCF (-638.08K). DGDCF has more cash in the bank: 2.23M vs. CPNFF (152K). CPNFF (0) and DGDCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CPNFFDGDCFCPNFF / DGDCF
Capitalization55.5M11.5M483%
EBITDA121K-638.08K-19%
Gain YTD391.00768.636570%
P/E Ratio16.27N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash152K2.23M7%
Total Debt267KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPNFF vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
CPNFF
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8479
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPNFF (84). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

DGDCF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (40). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DGDCF (100). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew significantly faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNFFDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WELPM110.001.50
+1.38%
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
MACT6.95N/A
N/A
MachTen, Inc.
TNEYF4.27-0.02
-0.47%
Tamarack Valley Energy, Ltd.
BPHLY34.75-2.25
-6.08%
Bank of the Philippine Islands
AUMBF0.81-0.06
-6.95%
1911 Gold Corp.

CPNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPNFF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPNFF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNFF
1D Price
Change %
CPNFF100%
-0.72%
ORZCF - CPNFF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
TORXF - CPNFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
VIORF - CPNFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
DGDCF - CPNFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRCUF - CPNFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
N/A
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-10.30%
IAG - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
More