CPNFF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
56.48M
CRCUF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
62.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPNFF vs CRCUF

Header iconCPNFF vs CRCUF Comparison
Open Charts CPNFF vs CRCUFBanner chart's image
Euro Sun Mining
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization56.48M
CANAGOLD RES
Price$0.32
Change+$0.01 (+3.23%)
Volume$700
Capitalization62.32M
CPNFF vs CRCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPNFF vs. CRCUF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPNFF is a Hold and CRCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CPNFF: $0.14 vs. CRCUF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: CPNFF and CRCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPNFF: 64% vs. CRCUF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CPNFF: $56.48M vs. CRCUF: $62.32M
CPNFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $56.48M. CRCUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $62.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPNFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRCUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CPNFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRCUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPNFF is a better buy in the long-term than CRCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPNFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPNFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CRCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPNFF is a better buy in the short-term than CRCUF.

Price Growth

CPNFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +25.12% price change this week, while CRCUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.59% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRCUF($62.3M) has a higher market cap than CPNFF($56.5M). CPNFF YTD gains are higher at: 407.014 vs. CRCUF (83.005). CPNFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 559K vs. CRCUF (-1.66M). CRCUF has more cash in the bank: 2.08M vs. CPNFF (1.6K). CRCUF has less debt than CPNFF: CRCUF (137K) vs CPNFF (249K). CPNFF (0) and CRCUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CPNFFCRCUFCPNFF / CRCUF
Capitalization56.5M62.3M91%
EBITDA559K-1.66M-34%
Gain YTD407.01483.005490%
P/E Ratio16.27N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.6K2.08M0%
Total Debt249K137K182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPNFF vs CRCUF: Fundamental Ratings
CPNFF
CRCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
13n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRCUF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (86). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRCUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CPNFF (100). This means that CRCUF’s stock grew similarly to CPNFF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CRCUF (39). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew similarly to CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

CPNFF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRCUF (97). This means that CPNFF’s stock grew significantly faster than CRCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPNFFCRCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBCSY57.600.06
+0.10%
KBC Group SA
MPZAF44.60N/A
N/A
Mips Ab
NDBKF13.47N/A
N/A
Nedbank Group, Ltd.
FFOXF0.04N/A
-4.31%
Firefox Gold Corp.
URLOF0.94-0.05
-4.97%
NameSilo Technologies Corp.

CPNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPNFF and ORZCF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPNFF and ORZCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPNFF
1D Price
Change %
CPNFF100%
+3.91%
ORZCF - CPNFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
VIORF - CPNFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TORXF - CPNFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CRCUF - CPNFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
DCHRF - CPNFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A

CRCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRCUF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRCUF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRCUF
1D Price
Change %
CRCUF100%
+3.43%
TORXF - CRCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CPNFF - CRCUF
0%
Poorly correlated
+3.91%
DCHRF - CRCUF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A