Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSIX
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$16.78
Change-$0.76 (-4.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
CPLSX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. CPLSX (1.15B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPLSX (1.37) vs NLSIX (0.05). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). CPLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: CPLSX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. CPLSX (2.67). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.77 vs. NLSIX (21.63).
| CPLSX | NLSIX | CPLSX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.32 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.084 | -0.597 | -182% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 8.16B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.05 | 2,697% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 3.79 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 26.67 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.77 | 21.63 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement