Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSCX
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$16.78
Change-$0.76 (-4.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. CPLSX (1.15B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPLSX (1.37) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) and NLSCX (2.43) have similar cost to investors . CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPLSX (2500). CPLSX (2.67) and NLSCX (2.65) have marching annual gain over last year. CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.77 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| CPLSX | NLSCX | CPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.084 | -0.693 | -156% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 8.16B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 2.65 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 22.54 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.77 | 14.66 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers