Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs NLSCX
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$17.45
Change-$0.06 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
CPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. CPLSX (1.13B). CPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPLSX (3.34) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPLSX (10 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). CPLSX (2.44) and NLSCX (2.43) have similar cost to investors . CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPLSX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. CPLSX (6.34). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.69 vs. NLSCX (16.30).
| CPLSX | NLSCX | CPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 2.43 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.404 | 5.709 | 165% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 7.82B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 6.80 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.30 | 20.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.69 | 16.30 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement