Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLSX vs DHLSX
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPLSX vs DHLSX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short A
Price$16.78
Change-$0.76 (-4.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Diamond Hill Long-Short I
Price$31.42
Change+$0.63 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
CPLSX vs DHLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLSX vs. DHLSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLSX is a Buy and DHLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHLSX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. CPLSX (1.15B). DHLSX pays higher dividends than CPLSX: DHLSX (1.57) vs CPLSX (1.37). CPLSX was incepted earlier than DHLSX: CPLSX (10 years) vs DHLSX (21 years). CPLSX (2.44) is less costly to investors than DHLSX (1.46). CPLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. DHLSX (46.00). CPLSX (2500) and DHLSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DHLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. CPLSX (2.67). CPLSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.77 vs. DHLSX (25.64).
| CPLSX | DHLSX | CPLSX / DHLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.44 | 1.46 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.084 | -1.226 | -88% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 2.29B | 50% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.57 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 13.24 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.67 | 25.44 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.77 | 25.64 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 53.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement