Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLIX vs NLSIX
CPLIX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts CPLIX vs NLSIX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short I
Price$17.05
Change-$0.80 (-4.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.15B
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
CPLIX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLIX vs. NLSIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLIX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. CPLIX (1.15B). CPLIX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: CPLIX (1.58) vs NLSIX (0.05). CPLIX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: CPLIX (10 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). CPLIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). CPLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). CPLIX (1000000) and NLSIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. CPLIX (2.93). CPLIX return over 5 years is better than : 30.46 vs. NLSIX (21.63).
| CPLIX | NLSIX | CPLIX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.32 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.32 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.067 | -0.597 | -179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 8.16B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 0.05 | 3,116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 3.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.64 | 26.67 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.46 | 21.63 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement