Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLIX vs NLSCX
CPLIX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts CPLIX vs NLSCX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short I
Price$18.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
CPLIX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLIX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLIX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. CPLIX (1.14B). CPLIX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: CPLIX (3.51) vs NLSCX (0.00). CPLIX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: CPLIX (9 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than CPLIX (2.19). CPLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLIX: NLSCX (1000) vs CPLIX (1000000). CPLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. NLSCX (8.83). CPLIX return over 5 years is better than : 61.52 vs. NLSCX (18.83).
| CPLIX | NLSCX | CPLIX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 2.43 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 2.43 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.481 | 5.936 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 7.54B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 8.83 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 16.55 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.52 | 18.83 | 327% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement