Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPLIX vs NLSAX
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts CPLIX vs NLSAX
Calamos Phineus Long/Short I
Price$18.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.14B
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
CPLIX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPLIX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPLIX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. CPLIX (1.14B). CPLIX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: CPLIX (3.51) vs NLSAX (0.00). CPLIX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: CPLIX (9 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). CPLIX (2.19) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). CPLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 342.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CPLIX: NLSAX (1000) vs CPLIX (1000000). CPLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.98 vs. NLSAX (9.48). CPLIX return over 5 years is better than : 61.52 vs. NLSAX (23.55).
| CPLIX | NLSAX | CPLIX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.68 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.481 | 6.392 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 7.54B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 9.48 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.95 | 19.24 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.52 | 23.55 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement