CPHC
Price
$16.89
Change
-$0.06 (-0.35%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
85.9M
SJMHF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.02 (+5.26%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPHC vs SJMHF

Header iconCPHC vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$16.89
Change-$0.06 (-0.35%)
Volume$8.11K
Capitalization85.9M
SJM Holdings
Price$0.40
Change+$0.02 (+5.26%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization2.92B
CPHC vs SJMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. SJMHF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a Hold and SJMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CPHC: $16.89 vs. SJMHF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and SJMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 130% vs. SJMHF: 144%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $85.9M vs. SJMHF: $2.92B
CPHC [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $85.9M. SJMHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the long-term than CPHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the short-term than CPHC.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -6.17% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.29% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SJMHF($2.92B) has a higher market cap than CPHC($85.9M). SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than CPHC: SJMHF (7772.77) vs CPHC (563.00). SJMHF YTD gains are higher at: 20.505 vs. CPHC (-16.987).
CPHCSJMHFCPHC / SJMHF
Capitalization85.9M2.92B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.98720.505-83%
P/E Ratio563.007772.777%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash8.87MN/A-
Total Debt170KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5592
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
69100
SMR RATING
1..100
9196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7940
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
123
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPHC's Valuation (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (99) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's SMR Rating (91) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (96) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPHC (79) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPHC’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (23) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPHCSJMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSBH9.530.13
+1.38%
FSBH CORP.
SUMCF8.190.03
+0.38%
Sumco Corp.
IAUGF5.55N/A
N/A
Insurance Australia Group Ltd.
MMILF0.05N/A
N/A
Metro Mining Ltd.
MAKAF0.07N/A
-3.57%
Hardcore Discoveries Ltd

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPHC has been loosely correlated with EIHDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPHC jumps, then EIHDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
-0.35%
EIHDF - CPHC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SJMHF - CPHC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLL - CPHC
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
CZR - CPHC
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
GDEN - CPHC
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
GXYYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
CPHC - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
SCHYF - SJMHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More