CPHC
Price
$16.54
Change
-$0.36 (-2.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
84.12M
SJMHF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.03 (-7.89%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPHC vs SJMHF

Header iconCPHC vs SJMHF Comparison
Open Charts CPHC vs SJMHFBanner chart's image
Canterbury Park Holding
Price$16.54
Change-$0.36 (-2.13%)
Volume$795
Capitalization84.12M
SJM Holdings
Price$0.35
Change-$0.03 (-7.89%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization2.69B
CPHC vs SJMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPHC vs. SJMHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPHC is a StrongBuy and SJMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CPHC: $16.54 vs. SJMHF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: CPHC and SJMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPHC: 28% vs. SJMHF: 290%
Market capitalization -- CPHC: $84.12M vs. SJMHF: $2.69B
CPHC [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $84.12M. SJMHF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPHC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSJMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SJMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SJMHF is a better buy in the long-term than CPHC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SJMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SJMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPHC is a better buy in the short-term than SJMHF.

Price Growth

CPHC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while SJMHF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -18.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.63% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SJMHF($2.7B) has a higher market cap than CPHC($84.1M). SJMHF has higher P/E ratio than CPHC: SJMHF (8460.39) vs CPHC (551.33). SJMHF YTD gains are higher at: 7.819 vs. CPHC (-18.708).
CPHCSJMHFCPHC / SJMHF
Capitalization84.1M2.7B3%
EBITDA6.75MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.7087.819-239%
P/E Ratio551.338460.397%
Revenue60.1MN/A-
Total Cash16.9MN/A-
Total Debt151KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPHC vs SJMHF: Fundamental Ratings
CPHC
SJMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73100
SMR RATING
1..100
9297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
658

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPHC's Valuation (91) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (99) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (100) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's SMR Rating (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (97) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SJMHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CPHC (80) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SJMHF’s stock grew similarly to CPHC’s over the last 12 months.

CPHC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SJMHF (17) in the null industry. This means that CPHC’s stock grew similarly to SJMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPHCSJMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SJMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CIBFX78.560.41
+0.52%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr F1
DFVQX17.00N/A
N/A
DFA International Vector Equity I
DYGAX15.14N/A
N/A
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Adviser
NDGAX24.59-0.12
-0.49%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A
DVFYX78.96-1.10
-1.37%
Davis Financial Y

CPHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPHC has been loosely correlated with EIHDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPHC jumps, then EIHDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPHC
1D Price
Change %
CPHC100%
-2.10%
EIHDF - CPHC
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SJMHF - CPHC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLL - CPHC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
CZR - CPHC
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
GDEN - CPHC
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More

SJMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SJMHF has been loosely correlated with SJMHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SJMHF jumps, then SJMHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SJMHF
1D Price
Change %
SJMHF100%
N/A
SJMHY - SJMHF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
GXYYY - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
CPHC - SJMHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
SCHYF - SJMHF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More